Big Wednesday and a big hard push. Still no Breakthrough.

 What a big day. I don't think we have ever done 5 runs in a day let alone in such top end conditions.

We went out there and went for it today. There were things that I needed to see. The conditions were, of course, just a little too much. The wind was gusting to 34 knots but I couldn't afford to procrastinate. Throughout the day I had come to realise that we are wasting our time down around 50 knots. The whole VESTAS Sailrocket 2 program is based around making ventilated foils work so that we can hit speeds over 60 knots. Small incremental gains around 50 knots is not what we are about now. I had a joblist to work through, a tough boat and a solid team who are comfortable handling her in strong conditions. It was time to push.

All runs were done with the ventilated/wedge foil

Run 1

Day still building so still a bit light, 1 person onboard, Easy run with a peak speed of only 44.3 knots. Nothing remarkable. No vibrations or unusual handling. Did a weave down the course with the rudder simply to see how the boat behaves and if any play in the system misbehaves. It didn't. We can reference this change from positive to negative loading later.

Run 2

Day building strong, 25-30 knots. 2 people on board (Helena's first proper run in the boat). Still a bit difficult to start with two people but nevertheless a good run. Peak speed 48.87 knots. Nothing remarkable again. No vibrations or unusual handling. Pod flying towards end.

Run 3

Wind 25-33 knots. 1 person onboard. Decided to try to max out the boat in tope end conditions. If it was going to ventilate... it would do it now. It didn't. This was this foils last chance. We maxed out at 50.8 knots.

This was not enough. Still no signs of the evil vibration. We should in theory be doing over 70 knots in these winds. Time to go under the knife.

Run 4

Wind 25-33 knots. 1 person onboard. water rough. 15 cm removed off the tip of the foil. I was expecting to see ventilation or at least the return of the vibration to show we were headed in that direction. I dipped the wing extension in a wave trough during the launch and did some minor damage. Peformance wise it was still fully functional. After a quick over the shoulder assessment I went for it. The start up was noticably less 'crisp' but VSR2 still hooked in and took off. She felt a bit more lively. As I beared away onto the course she did a big weave that took a fair bit of rudder to correct. This could be the foil switching between attached and ventilated flow. It felt like there were moments of 'release' in there and even the run itself felt faster.

It was rough though and this always adds drama and a sense of speed. It felt better although the peak speed was almost the same at 50.52 knots. The average was lower at only 46.02 knots. Oddly no vibration or sense of ventilation apart from that weave at the start.

Run 5

Getting dark now. Swam ashore to do a BBC radio interview whils the boys towed VSR2 up to the top of the course. The sun was setting and I wanted to do one more run with the new trimmed foil before trimming another 15cm off it. I ran up the beach to catch up with them and we pulled the wing up one more time in similar 26-32 knot conditions whilst the African sun set (first flamingoes present). 1 person. Good run with no weave or vibrations. Noted the hard surging of the boat which feels like it is pulling a lot of drag. Peak speed of 50.24 knots, (average 47.78). Damnit. 50 knots is boring now.

So, where are we? With limited footage and data downloaded I can still tell you that we are fully attached even with 15cm of main foil removed in strong, fully sheeted on conditions. No bad vibrations were felt although there was that big weave on the start-up and bear away of run 4. We will look at that one more closely. It's pretty surprising that reducing the area of the foil didn't initiate the bad vibration but then maybe that was caused by other more subtle situations. I am keen to chop off another 15 cm. I want this thing to ventilate. We will discuss it further and sleep on it. 

Overall it was a very good day. We pushed very hard in as strong a conditions as we should ever need to sail in. We did more runs than ever before and brought the boat back intact and ready for more tomorrow. Of course it's annoying that we didn't break through but days like this will create our end result. The whole team did a great job to keep the ball rolling and not fumble it.

Helena got a new PB of 48.87 knots but just missed out on becoming the second female ever to cross the 50 knot barrier on a sailing craft. I'm sure she will do it many times in the future.

In the end I had no issues with chopping the foil. It's only purpose is to go well over 60 knots and it simply isn't doing it. The rest of the boat is waiting for the right foil solution to set it free.

The boys have gone home after the other great team at The Raft sentg pizzas, extra big burgers and some beers around to the container for the data transferring session. It's 20 to 11 now and we will be up and at it early tomorrow. We will double check and reconfigure the boat. The beam and rig will be moved forward in anticipation of the greater leeway angles generated by a ventilated foil... and most likely another 15 cm will be trimmed off. VSR2 will be remeasured for reference and calibration purposes. Then we will head out and do it all over again.

The good news is that Saturday is grunting up and may be useable.

It's not over yet party people. As always, we will push it right to the end. We aren't just hanging around here. From the perspective of our teams performance today, we did very well. I doubt we could have squeezed much more out of the day. We just have to find what makes this dog hunt.

Righto, gotta call Malc.

Cheers, Paul.

Comments

Aspect ratio

Perhaps you should be chopping the foil from the trailing edge forward at this point to preserve span? You could taper the chord from the bend to the tip to keep strength in the transition. Just a thought; it is apparently blunt back there anyway?

Good luck. I am impressed by your field mod schedule. Success is 99% failure.

Plastic surgery

Drastic actions today, no doubt endorsed by the Brains Trust. I hope you find what you seek!

Will we toast a new record tomorrow?

Dawn of a new day for you

Good luck and may the force be with you :)

Foil Mean Pressure

Hi Guys,
We design propeller blade foils for semi cavitating and supercavitating applications and the transitions you are experiencing is facinating and not at all surprising. We experience similar issues on a weekly basis.
Whilst it obviously isn't a simple process, we were wondering what sort of mean blade pressure you are working on to target full ventilation of the foil.
We generally work on approximately 100kPa above static fluid pressure on the pressure face as the operating pressure, with supercavitation triggering at approx 75kPa. We are using relatively conventional supercavitating sections with camber aspect ratios of approx 50:1 for good transitional efficiency and top end efficiency.
For your development list;
- Air injection to trigger stable ventilation
- Polymer injection on the foil pressure face and planing surfaces to significantly reduce foil friction.
Hope this helps.
Pete

REPLY... RE: Foil Mean Pressure.

 Hi Peter, thanks for your input as I imagine people in your field must have spent a lot of time looking at these issues in great depth. Obviously our scenario is a little different although many factors still apply. We are learning about the compromise we need to make between your powered world and our sail driven world. We are starting to understand where we stand in regards to pressure loading throughout the speed range and have come to the conclusion that our current foil is too big. We chopped 15cm off it yesterday and have chopped another 15 cm off it today. The trouble is that it is now turning into a less than desirable overall shape with an uneccesarily thick tip and low aspect ratio. The pressure loading is obviously going up but it does not seem to be triggering any ventilation yet. We know it will but we wonder if just continuously chopping this foil is the right way to do it (Just got back in today after chopping ANOTHER 15 cm off). The foil looks ridiculous and yet it hit 51.36 knots... still with no great signs of ventilation. It was getting pretty deperate there. I think we have learnt enough to warrant sitting back, digesting the past couple of days and having a big re-think.

We aren't allowed to use any stored energy on the boat so air injection would have to be driven naturally. The foil is already surface piercing with a large, blunt back surface which should be base ventilated. We aren't very deep anymore. Polymer injection eh? Although we have bigger issues right now, I'm listening:)

Cheers, Paul

Foil Stuff

Hi Paul,
Really appreciate you taking the time to reply. I'm sure you guys have plenty to do at the moment.

Obviously, foil optimisation is going to be 90% of your game from here in.

One interesting thing we have found is that the mean pressure (side force) required to trigger a supercavity is not linear with the chord length of the foil sections. A chord length 20% longer might need 35% more pressure(force). Our simulations seem to suggest this relationship is related to the volume of the cavity than the actual chord length. Circulation theory would tend to back this up. So, while reducing foil span might also be more efficient, don't discount cropping the trailing edge of the foil to reduce chord length if you re still looking for that trigger. Trimming the trailing edge is also generally beneficial in this situation as it is the region of the foil with the highest camber, and cutting this off effectively increases the angle of attack at the leading edge more than just cutting span away. This is essentially what was done in the "good old days" of cupped surface drive propellers. Essentially, they cut off the cup to trigger supercavitation.

On the polymer injection, this is something they tried on the AC90 trimaran hull surfaces. I know someone involved with the testing and apparently the gain was very significant. They had a thin slot up the front of the hull they fed liquid polymer from. Rumours suggest they gained at least 3 knots with it turned on. Whether they ran it during the race I have no idea.

Good luck for the last runs.
Pete

foils

well done 5 runs is some going, good luck for tomorrow

website by hangmyhat